Logo

Unbundling Virtual Conference - Shared screen with speaker view
Catherine Brukalo
41:19
I am loving the transcript feature! Thank you for offering this!
Catherine Brukalo
52:41
I'd say C&D
Catherine Brukalo
52:55
The poll only allowed for one choice.
Michael Butterfield
53:24
That was a basic question. I think there is a belief that unbundled is about intensive and not cost effective.
Catherine Brukalo
54:04
I think that it depends on the jurisdiction.
Michael Butterfield
54:14
Labour intensive
Shaun Jamison
54:45
It surprises me that attorneys wouldn't be aware. My impression is that clients don't understand this is an opportunity.
Roberta Tepper
59:41
It's sometimes not an issue of being unaware - but an issue of understanding how it might work or might not work for any particular lawyer or practice area.
Catherine Brukalo
01:00:08
I have concerns about 'coaching' the clients as to their gong to court themselves as I fear that they will say "my lawyer told me to say" and this is where the issues start.
Catherine Brukalo
01:00:54
it is possible to document that one merely drafts documents, and doesn't 'coach'
Catherine Brukalo
01:01:12
and I agree that the agreement should include what we don't do.
Kathy Atkinson
01:05:18
The complaints I hear with attorneys in Alaska being unwilling to do "unbundled services" is that even if the attorney uses a limited entry of appearances, the attorney gets roped into doing more without assurance that they will be getting paid. For example, the attorney agreed to appear at a particular hearing, but during the hearing other things come up that now the judge and the client expects the attorney to do, including at the hearing itself involving a deeper dive that the attorney did not anticipate. The attorney wants to cut bait. The judge is resistant to letting the attorney "out", even with the filed limited scope agreement, because it makes the job for the judge easier if the client has an attorney.
Roberta Tepper
01:09:19
And put it in plain English!
Samira Nazem
01:10:42
Limited Scope Toolkit: http://chicagobarfoundation.org/pdf/resources/limited-scope-representation.pdf
Jim Calloway
01:12:04
It is critically important to outline, to the extent possible, what the lawyer is NOT doing because those tasks remain the responsibility of the client.
Roberta Tepper
01:29:08
And keep in mind that even the most sophisticated client is not processing information as well as usual when they are under stress; and that's the reason they come to lawyers in the first place. So stating what might otherwise be considered the obvious is never time wasted.
AMP
01:31:45
Is there a resource that provides a clear guideline for practice areas *not* advisable for unbundled services? It sounds like criminal law is on that list. Additionally, if a lawyer is doing mostly unbundled services like “mediation coaching” - is this more “legal consulting” vs. “practicing law”? Thank you !
Catherine Brukalo
01:36:46
I appreciate your response!
Roberta Tepper
01:42:31
Your state and local bar practice management advisors - free and usually confidential bar membership benefits - are your best source for information on how to best do this.
Jayne Reardon
01:51:57
Thank you all for an informative panel!
Sarah Coffey Bowes
01:52:18
Thank you!!
Rosa María Abdelnour
01:52:28
Thank you very much!
Catherine Brukalo
01:52:48
thank you!
Andrew Liggett
01:53:14
THANK YOU for your perspectives
IAALS
01:55:27
as you enter the webinar for the 1:30 panel please keep your video and audio off
Samira Nazem
01:56:53
Hi everyone! Thanks for joining us. Apologies for the strangeness here. We are using the same Zoom link that was used for the first session, so need to stay on mute until the webinar begins. Do any of the panelists have any last minute questions?
Pat Wrona
02:04:32
Hello Stacey and Judge O'Grady--glad to be with you both today for this panel! Pat
Hon. Keven O'Grady
02:05:41
Hi, the pleasure is all mine. What a great turn out. Organizers deserve congrats.
Stacey Marz
02:07:28
Yes, great to be with you too!
Bill Adams
02:17:14
Will the CARPLS slides be provided to the program attendees?
Pat Wrona
02:17:49
sure
Jess Bednarz
02:18:40
Hi Bill, Yes, the CARPLS slides will be made available to attendees.
Jennifer Simmons
02:24:07
Could Pat please address how CARPLS handles conflict checks? In that high-volume, fast-paced, courthouse based model I wonder whether conflicts can sometimes get missed and how they've addressed ethical concerns around that issue.
Jennifer Simmons
02:28:04
Thank you!
Bonnie Hough
02:28:14
My recollection is that with the debt clinic is that the attorney would give people a piece of colored paper with the identified defense on it. The judge knew the code and could ask more questions of the defendant who was tongue tied. It seemed like a really helpful strategy.
Philip Bryce
02:28:48
Would some of the issues we’re discussing be addressed in part if nonlawyers could own legal businesses. Might Walmart/Costco/Sears etc do a good job of providing consumer legal services, and giving lawyers jobs?
Rochelle Hahn
02:46:57
For ERP project — are landlords also getting legal advice from the panel?
AMP
02:48:04
Ms. Wrona: do you mind sharing your local “mediation partner”?
Desi Imetovski
02:48:58
Is there a cost associated with this program (Cook County Legal Aid for Housing)?
Jess Bednarz
02:54:35
Hi Laura, I see that you have your hand raised. Do you have a question you’d like to ask?
Jess Bednarz
02:55:19
If yes, can you please type it into the chat?
AMP
03:00:22
Great program! Is there a link to this “night court” program? Thank you !
Janet Drobinske (she/her/hers)
03:02:56
You can find materials and resources here: https://iaals.du.edu/events/unbundled-legal-services-new-normal#tab=materials
Katherine Alteneder
03:03:37
Hey this is Katherine Alteneder. SRLN will do a write- up on CHgo and KS programs like the one we have for Ak erp. Our writer will reach out.
Katherine Alteneder
03:03:56
Congratulations to all! Really awesome
IAALS
03:04:37
Indeed so. Great job one and all!
Margaret Malloy
03:05:49
emeritus?
John Greacen
03:11:45
What about pubic service announcements of this newly available form of legal assistance?
Jess Bednarz
03:12:29
Here is another example in Minnesota: https://mnunbundled.org/go/1
Jess Bednarz
03:17:11
And here is another example from Colorado. At some point in the process, potential clients can filter attorneys by those who have indicated that they offer unbundled services: https://www.licensedlawyer.org/co.
Michael Butterfield
03:17:42
I am in BC Canada. Unbundling is quite new for us. This was very useful to get a sense of how it can be better integrated with the court process. Thank you.
Jess Bednarz
03:17:46
If anyone else in the audience has examples, please share them!
Jess Bednarz
03:19:09
If you want to learn about how unbundling can be a win for practitioners, join us for the first section on Thursday!
Emily Gale
03:20:26
Question for Pat: in Chicago, with no income qualifications, how do you provide unbundled services to both parties? Do all litigants qualify for legal aid?
Jayne Reardon
03:20:56
Thank you all for an informative and inspiring panel!
Pat Wrona
03:22:16
Hi Emily there is no income limit for this one in court program, as it is funded by the county. so all those litigants are eligible for that program. After that two weeks, then if legal aid were needed after that income would apply!